Interoperating with WebSphere MQ: Comparison of architectures

A high-level architectural comparison of the different ways that you can send messages between WebSphere® Application Server and a WebSphere MQ network, describing the advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

WebSphere MQ as an external messaging provider. The WebSphere MQ messaging provider does not use service integration. It provides JMS messaging access to WebSphere MQ directly from WebSphere Application Server.

Multi-bus: WebSphere MQ network as a foreign bus (using WebSphere MQ links). A WebSphere MQ link provides an indirect connection between a service integration bus and a queue manager within a WebSphere MQ messaging network. With this type of connection, the messaging bus is seen by the WebSphere MQ network as a virtual queue manager, and the WebSphere MQ network is seen by service integration as a messaging bus. A Websphere MQ link allows WebSphere Application Server applications to send point-to-point messages to WebSphere MQ queues (defined as destinations in the service integration bus), and allows WebSphere MQ applications to send point-to-point messages to destinations in the service integration bus (defined as remote queues in WebSphere MQ). The link also allows WebSphere Application Server applications to subscribe to messages published by WebSphere MQ applications, and WebSphere MQ applications to subscribe to messages published by WebSphere Application Server applications. The link converts messages between the formats used by WebSphere Application Server and those used by WebSphere MQ, and handles data conversion of messages.

Interoperation model Advantages Disadvantages General
WebSphere MQ as an external JMS provider
  • You do not have to configure a service integration bus or messaging engines.
  • You can connect directly to WebSphere MQ queue managers.
  • You only have to manage a single JMS messaging provider rather than two.
  • You can connect to queue managers in client mode or bindings mode.
  • You can exploit WebSphere Application Server clusters.
  • If using message-driven beans, performance is lower.
  • Interaction between WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere MQ is not seamless.
  • You cannot use mediations for modifying messages, for routing or for logging.
  • This architecture requires more WebSphere MQ administration, less WebSphere Application Server administration.
WebSphere MQ link
  • A WebSphere MQ client facility is not required on the gateway WebSphere MQ queue manager.
  • Each end of the link appears in natural form to the other; WebSphere MQ appears to service integration to be a (foreign) bus, service integration appears to WebSphere MQ to be a (virtual) queue manager.
  • Better performance over the link is possible when compared with WebSphere MQ Servers or direct connection to WebSphere MQ as an external JMS messaging provider.
  • A managed connection from one node to another is created, but not from every application server in the cell.
  • You do not have to define individual WebSphere MQ queues to the service integration bus.
  • You can join publish and subscribe domains across service integration bus and WebSphere MQ.
  • Good security support is provided, for example control over which users are allowed to put messages onto queues.
  • You can use mediations for modifying messages, for routing, and for logging.
  • WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere MQ can exist on separate hosts.
  • Seamless interaction between WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere MQ.
  • You must configure a service integration bus and messaging engines.
  • You cannot connect to queue managers in bindings mode.
  • Optimum load balancing is less easy to achieve because messages have to be 'pushed' from either end of the link.
  • This architecture requires more WebSphere Application Server administration, less WebSphere MQ administration.



Related concepts
Learning about interoperating with a WebSphere MQ network
Concept topic    

Terms of Use | Feedback

Last updated: Aug 29, 2010 8:25:23 PM CDT
http://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/wsbroker/redirect?version=vela&product=was-nd-zos&topic=cjmig_comparison.dita
File name: cjmig_comparison.html