From nate@rootlabs.com Fri Nov 21 10:37:19 2003 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C75F16A4CE for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:37:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3272B43FD7 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:37:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 75483 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Nov 2003 18:37:18 -0000 Message-Id: <20031121103425.Y75438@root.org> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:37:18 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson To: sebastian ssmoller Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1069403331.919.113.camel@tyrael.linnet> Subject: Re: PR i386/57909 References: <18025.1068470822@www24.gmx.net> <20031119153032.D69420@root.org> <1069356348.919.56.camel@tyrael.linnet> <20031120204523.B73432@root.org> <1069403331.919.113.camel@tyrael.linnet> >Number: 59559 >Category: i386 >Synopsis: Re: PR i386/57909 >Confidential: yes >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: gnats-admin >State: closed >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Nov 21 10:40:09 PST 2003 >Closed-Date: Sat Nov 22 23:56:42 PST 2003 >Last-Modified: Thu Jul 01 05:36:26 GMT 2004 >Originator: >Release: >Organization: >Environment: >Description: On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, sebastian ssmoller wrote: > this morning i tested ur patch. after rebooting the new kernel the first > thing i noticed was that there were no warnings about stupid values in > the acpi thermal vars e.g. _CRT anymore :). so i looked at "sysctl > hw.acpi.thermal" et voila: usable values i guess (at least better than > without the patch): > > hw.acpi.thermal.min_runtime: 0 > hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate: 30 > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 3292 > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.active: 0 > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.thermal_flags: 0 > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: 3782 > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._HOT: -1 > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT: 3832 > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._ACx: 3212 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 > > so next i started a buildworld to verify whether the acpi_tasks will > appear again but they didnt :). the whole buildworld ran without any > problem :) > > ur patch seems to solve the problem. can u explain me in short what > exactly the problem was ? > > thx > seb Yes, your output looks fine. IndexField data types weren't being read/written at the right offset. I'll see if I can get the fix into 5.2R. -Nate >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: linimon State-Changed-When: Sat Nov 22 23:55:38 PST 2003 State-Changed-Why: Yet another stray followup to i386/57909, already closed. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=59559 >Unformatted: