Replacement for DOS RESTORE - [55 lines] Dan Wright is a bright young blind assembler programmer I have been coaching. He totally rewrote Restore 5.1, a replacement for MS DOS Restore. It was based on my Restore 4.2. What's wrong with the official DOS Restore? 1. The DOS 3.2 version according to a Microsoft technician has 22 reported bugs. It is "the lemon of MS DOS" to use his phrase. 2. Under DOS 3.2, MS DOS and PC DOS use incompatible formats for Restore. You cannot restore files backed up on PC DOS to an MS DOS system and vice versa. 3. You cannot restore files backed up on DOS 3.3 to a machine running DOS 3.2. Version 3.2 Restore will not run under DOS 3.1, etc. 4. The user interface is very unforgiving of mistakes. What's so great about Canadian Mind Products Restore 5.1? 1. It will restore disks backed up under any level of DOS (2.0 or higher) to a machine running any level of MS/PC DOS (2.0 or higher). 2. It is much smaller and faster, and it fixes all the bugs I know of in official Restore. 3. Because CMP Restore is not proprietary and because it runs under any level of DOS, it can be used to mass distribute files and programs too large to fit on a single diskette. Source is provided to allow customization for automated installs of proprietary software. What's the difference between Restore 4.2 and 5.1? 1. Though Restore 4.2 will run under DOS 3.3 and 4.01 and will restore files backed up under lower levels of DOS it will not restore files produced by 3.3 and 4.01 Backup. Version 5.1 rectifies this deficiency. You can now even restore backed up under MS DOS 4.01 to a PC DOS 2.0 system. What's the catch? Restore may not be used for military purposes. Currently one of Americas major defense contractors, Rockwell International, is using Restore 4.2 to distribute its CAD software. They have refused to stop and apparently I have no legal recourse. Version 5.1 is copyrighted and Shareware to give me the legal right to enforce the no-military-use restriction. Love Roedy