








                                  [1mAegis[0m

                       [1mA Project Change Supervisor[0m


                               [4mPeter[24m [4mMiller[0m
                Australian Geological Survey Organisation


                                 [4mABSTRACT[0m


            Many  CASE  systems attempt to provide everything,
            including  bubble  charts,  source   control   and
            compilers;  even  if  you  don't  like  one of the
            tools, you are stuck with it.  In contrast,  UNIX1
            utilities provide many components of a CASE system
            - compilers, editors, dependency maintenance tools
            (such  as [4mmake[24m), and source control tools (such as
            RCS).  You may substitute the tool of your  choice
            if  you  don't  like  the  ones  supplied with the
            system.    Aegis   adds   software   configuration
            management   to   these   tools.    True  to  UNIX
            philosophy, Aegis does not dictate the  choice  of
            any  of  the  other tools (although it may stretch
            them to their limits).





       [1m1.  Introduction[0m

       Aegis performs some of the tasks increasingly referred to as
       software  configuration management (SCM).  It supervises the
       development of changes to a project and the  integration  of
       those changes back into the master source of the project.

       There are existing programs, such as RCS or CVS, which could
       do some of this task.  The difference is that Aegis does not
       allow  changes  to  be  unconditionally  added to the master
       source.  It enforces a number of requirements, each designed
       to  ensure  that the project does not "go backwards" because
       of a change.

       The word aegis  was  chosen  as  the  name  because  of  its
       meaning:

               [1maegis [22m(ee.j.iz) [4mn.[24m, a protection, a defence.

       ____________________

       1. UNIX is a trademark of Bell Laboratories.

       Aegis                   Peter Miller                  Page 1





                                   - 2 -



       In  Greek mythology, the god Zeus had a shield called Aegis,
       which provided a supernatural defence.  While Aegis does not
       claim supernatural powers, it does provide a way of managing
       changes to a software project and a solution to many of  the
       problems   encountered  when  a  team  of  developers  write
       software.  Some common examples of these problems include:

          +o bugs which refuse to die;

          +o lost changes,  from  developers  "tripping  over"  each
            other;

          +o not knowing who changed the source, or why;

          +o using  the  wrong  versions of the sources to build the
            project;

          +o not having a working copy  to  demonstrate  to  anxious
            management, or anxious customers.

       While  Aegis can help solve these problems, and many others,
       it cannot solve every problem, it is not a silver bullet.


       [1m2.  What is SCM?[0m

       Software configuration  management  (SCM)  is  a  large  and
       increasingly   complex   discipline.    It  can  be  briefly
       described as consisting of a number of parts, which include:

       Manifest Control
         It  is  necessary  to  know what all the source files of a
         project are, and where they can  be  found.   It  is  also
         necessary to know when they were added or removed.

       Version Control
         It  is necessary to know which version of each source file
         is used.  It is necessary to be able to  recreate  earlier
         versions of the project from this information.

       Build Control
         It is necessary to know how to construct the object of the
         project from the source files.

       Change Control
         It is necessary to know  who  performed  each  change  and
         when, who initiated each change and why.

       Quality Control
         It  is  necessary  to  know  that the changes made to your
         project meet your quality criteria.  It is essential  that
         changes do not "break" an otherwise working project.

       The  last  item  on  this list is frequently absent from SCM


       Aegis                   Peter Miller                  Page 2





                                   - 3 -



       systems, and is a major focus of Aegis' design.

       [1m2.1  Development Model  [22mThe master source of a project,  and
       all  the  implications flowing from it, such as object files
       and executables, and all the tests, is called a [4mbaseline[24m, to
       use common SCM terminology.

       Aegis  is designed to try to ensure that the baseline always
       [4mworks[24m, where "works" is defined as passing all the tests  in
       the baseline.

       All file history tools include two functions: you can "check
       out" a file for editing, and you "check in"  the  file  when
       you  are  finished.  The concept may be generalized for sets
       of files.  The problem with using such a simple  process  is
       that  the  "check  in"  is  unconditional.  Aegis breaks the
       "check  in"  into  several  steps,  so  that  inadequate  or
       defective alterations to the baseline are far less likely.

       In  Aegis,  the  unit  of  change  to  the  baseline is, un-
       originally, called a [4mchange[24m.  Each change must be atomic, it
       must  leave  the  baseline  in a working state, and must not
       depend on any other change being  performed  simultaneously.
       For  example,  when  the interface to a function is altered,
       the change must also include alterations to  every  call  of
       that function.

       Aegis  tracks all the source files included in a change, and
       sufficient history information for each file so that when  a
       change  is  finished,  an  algorithm similar to that used in
       RCS-Merge or CVS-Update  may  be  employed  to  resolve  any
       problems caused by the ability to simultaneously include the
       same source file in several different changes.

       Developers may not directly edit the baseline.  The baseline
       is  updated  by a user called the [4mintegrator[24m, who integrates
       the baseline with the change, and then validates the result,
       before accepting it as the new baseline.


       [1m3.  Change Control[0m

       Change control in Aegis is implemented as six states which a
       change must pass through.  Various criteria must be  met  to
       leave  one  state and advance to the next.  See Figure 1 for
       an overview of the change states.

       [1m3.1  Awaiting Development  [22mNot all members of the  team  may
       create  changes.   This is controlled by an access list, and
       thus may be as restricted or open as your project  requires.
       Once  a  change  has  been  created,  it  is in the [4mawaiting[0m
       [4mdevelopment[24m state.  A change consists of little more than  a
       description in this state.



       Aegis                   Peter Miller                  Page 3





                                   - 4 -




       [40m                              |[0m
                           [40mnew       |new[0m
                         [40mchange      |change[0m
                          [40mundo[0m
                                 [40mawaiting[0m
                               [40mdevelopment[0m
                                     [40m|[0m
                         [40mdevelop     |develop[0m
                         [40mbegin       |begin[0m
                         [40mundo[0m


                                  [40mbeing[0m
                                [40mdeveloped[0m

                                     [40m|[0m
                            [40mdevelop  |devreelvoipew[0m
                            [40mend      |end fail[0m
                            [40mundo[0m
                       [40mdevelop    being[0m
                       [40mend       reviewed integrate[0m
                       [40mundo          |         fail[0m
                                     [40m|revrieevwiew[0m
                                     [40m|passpass[0m
                                          [40mundo[0m
                                 [40mawaiting[0m
                               [40mintegration[0m
                                     [40m|[0m
                         [40mintegrate   |integrate[0m
                         [40mbegin       |begin[0m
                         [40mundo[0m
                                  [40mbeing[0m
                                [40mintegrated[0m
                                     [40m|[0m
                                     [40m|integrate[0m
                                     [40m|pass[0m


                                [40mcompleted[0m


                 [1m[40mFigure 1: [22mChange States and Transitions[0m

       [1m3.2  Being  Developed   [22mNot  all  members  of  the  team may
       develop changes.  This is controlled by an access list,  and
       thus  may be as open or restricted as your project requires.

       A variety of methods  may  be  used  to  assign  changes  to
       developers,   but  at  some  point,  either  from  receiving
       instructions to do  so,  or  browsing  and  finding  one,  a
       developer  assigns  a  change  to herself.  Once a change is
       assigned to a developer, a development directory is  created
       for it, and it advances to the [4mbeing[24m [4mdeveloped[24m state.


       Aegis                   Peter Miller                  Page 4





                                   - 5 -



       This  state  is  the coal face.  Project source files can be
       edited in this state only.  Source files  which  are  to  be
       edited  are  copied  from  the baseline into the development
       directory.2 Aegis is used to copy  the  files,  so  that  it
       knows  which files are being modified by this change.  Files
       can also be created or deleted by a change.  Again, Aegis is
       used  to  do  this, so that it knows what is happening.  You
       don't have to issue two commands this way, one to tell  UNIX
       to do it, and another to tell Aegis that you have done it.

       [1mBuild [22mOnce you have edited the source files, the change must
       be built.   [4mBuilding[24m  is  the  process  of  manipulating  or
       translating  the  source  files  in  some way to produce the
       object of the project.   For  programs  this  usually  means
       compiling   the  source  files  and  linking  them  into  an
       executable program.  The build is performed  via  Aegis,  so
       that  it  can  look at the exit status and know if the build
       succeeded or not.  A successful build is a  requirement  for
       leaving the [4mbeing[24m [4mdeveloped[24m state and advancing to the next.

       There are no facilities in Aegis for describing how to build
       the  project.   Instead,  Aegis  delegates  this  task  to a
       [4mdependency[24m  [4mmaintenance[24m  [4mtool[24m  (DMT).   This  delegation  is
       stored  as  a  UNIX  command to be performed when a build is
       requested.  There is no provision for  Aegis  to  understand
       [4many[24m  dependencies,  as these are expected to be described in
       the DMT's configuration file, itself a source  file  of  the
       project.

       Typically a DMT is a program like [4mmake[24m(1), however this old-
       faithful is not able to cope with the demands placed upon it
       by Aegis.3 The major problem is the two-directory  structure
       used:  when  the  DMT  is  looking  for files, it must first
       search  in  the  development  directory  and  then  in   the
       baseline.   It is best if the DMT can do this transparently,
       because it makes the rules much easier to write.   The  [4mcook[0m
       program,  also written by the author, is a DMT known to work
       with Aegis.

       [1mTest [22mEach change must be accompanied by at least  one  test.
       Except  for  the  way tests are created, so that Aegis knows
       they are tests rather than ordinary source files,  they  are
       treated  identically  to  source files: they may be modified
       and even deleted by later changes, by the same  commands  as
       used  for non-test source files, and they are subject to the
       same process.

       ____________________

       2. Only those files which  are  to  be  edited  need  to  be
          copied.   The  baseline  acts as a cache for object files
          not present in the development directory.

       3. Even  GNU  Make  3.65  is  not  up to the task; the VPATH
          semantics are too limited.

       Aegis                   Peter Miller                  Page 5





                                   - 6 -



       Tests are Bourne shell scripts.  They are executed via Aegis
       so  that  it  can  examine the exit status, and know if each
       test has passed or failed.  Having tests, and passing  them,
       is  a  requirement for leaving the [4mbeing[24m [4mdeveloped[24m state and
       advancing to the next.

       As changes are integrated into the baseline, the tests which
       accompany  each  change  accumulate  into  a regression test
       suite.  A developer may optionally run all or part  of  this
       regression  test  suite to make sure that her change has not
       broken any existing functionality.  Because this  regression
       test suite grows steadily, it is not practical to run all of
       it for every  change;  so  Aegis  is  designed  to  make  it
       relatively  easy to run a (hopefully representative) subset.

       [1mDifference [22mOnce a change builds and tests  successfully,  it
       is  [4mdifferenced[24m.   This  is  the  process  of creating files
       showing  the  difference  between  the  baseline   and   the
       development  directory,  for  each file in the change.  This
       allows reviewers to  examine  all  the  edits  made  by  the
       developer,  not just the ones they can find.  The difference
       command is configurable, as appropriate for each project.

       [1mConflicts [22mThis difference stage is also where problems  with
       out-of-date  files are resolved.  If two developers copy the
       same revision of the same file into two  different  changes,
       one  of them will be integrated into the baseline before the
       other, hence the possibility of one or more files being out-
       of-date.  A three-way merge between the common ancestor, the
       file in the development directory, and the current  file  in
       the baseline, is performed.4 This produces a  merge  of  the
       two competing edits, which the developer should then examine
       to make sure  the  automatic  merge  has  produced  sensible
       results.    This   merge   tool  is  also  configurable,  as
       appropriate for each project.  The out-of-date file is  then
       marked  as  up-to-date,  and the change will require another
       build and test, to ensure that  the  merge  has  not  broken
       anything.

       [1m3.3  Being  Reviewed   [22mOnce  the files are up-to-date, built
       and tested, the developer may  advance  the  change  to  the
       [4mbeing[24m  [4mreviewed[24m  state.  At this point, all the source files
       in the change are locked, preventing any other changes  with
       files  in common from advancing to the [4mbeing[24m [4mreviewed[24m state.
       If any change file is already locked, the developer will  be
       told to try again later.

       The  style  of  review  is  not dictated by Aegis.  The only
       requirement is that an authorised user tell Aegis  that  the
       review  passed  or  failed.  Not all members of the team may

       ____________________

       4. This is the same algorithm as used by CVS-Update and RCS-
          Merge.

       Aegis                   Peter Miller                  Page 6





                                   - 7 -



       review changes.  This is controlled by an access  list,  and
       thus  may be as restricted or open as your project requires.

       A number of review schemes have been observed.  Two extremes
       are presented here:

          +o A  single  team  member is responsible for coordinating
            all reviews.  Each review is performed by  a  panel  of
            four  team  members in addition to the developer of the
            change.  Only the review coordinator,  after  receiving
            the  paperwork  from the review panel, may pass or fail
            reviews.

          +o Any developer may  review  any  change;  this  is  done
            informally.   Aegis prevents a developer from reviewing
            her  own  change,  to  avoid  an  obvious  conflict  of
            interests.

       Many  other review styles are possible, but the one best for
       your project will probably fall between these extremes.

       Reviewers know several things about a change  in  the  [4mbeing[0m
       [4mreviewed[24m  state,  because  of  the  requirements for getting
       there.

          +o The change is known to build successfully.

          +o The change is known to have tests and  to  have  passed
            them.

          +o The  source  files in the change are known to be up-to-
            date with respect to the baseline.

       This allows reviewers to concentrate on completeness of  the
       code,  completeness of the tests, and standards issues, etc.

       If a change fails  review,  it  is  returned  to  the  [4mbeing[0m
       [4mdeveloped[24m  state for further work by the original developer.
       The reviewer is not responsible for fixing problems found by
       the review.

       [1m3.4  Awaiting Integration  [22mOnce a change passes review it is
       advanced to the [4mawaiting[24m [4mintegration[24m state.  This state is a
       queue.   Only  one  change  at a time is integrated into the
       baseline, even though all changes  in  this  state  have  no
       files  in  common.   This  allows clear indications of which
       change is at fault,  should  the  integrator  discover  that
       there are problems.  See Figure 2 for a diagram of how files
       flow through this model.

       [1m3.5  Being Integrated  [22mNot  all  members  of  the  team  may
       integrate  changes.   This  is controlled by an access list,
       and thus may be  as  open  or  restricted  as  your  project
       requires.


       Aegis                   Peter Miller                  Page 7





                                   - 8 -




       [40m[0m



                               [40mbaseline[0m





                        [40mdevelopmentdevelopment[0m
                         [40mdirectory directory[0m




                              [40mintegrator[0m
                                     [40mintegrate[0m
                                   [40m|      pass[0m
                         [40mintegrate |[0m
                             [40mbegin |[0m

                             [40mintegration[0m
                              [40mdirectory[0m




                [1m[40mFigure 2: [22mFlow of Files through the Model[0m

       To  integrate  a  change  with  the baseline, an integration
       directory is  created  by  copying  the  baseline,  or  more
       usually  creating a logical copy using links.  The change is
       then applied to this integration directory.

       The integration copy is then built and tested.  This  is  to
       ensure  that  it  was not just some quirk of the developer's
       environment that allowed the change to get  this  far,5  and
       also  to  have all files in the new baseline consistent with
       each other.

       The integrator may choose to run a representative subset  of
       the  regression  test  suite, in addition to the tests which
       accompanied the change.

       In addition to rejecting a change because it fails to  build
       or test, an integrator may also act as a reviewer; this is a
       good place to watch the watchers, and monitor the quality of
       reviews.   Integrators may thus veto a change even though it

       ____________________

       5. For example, a weird environment variable setting,  or  a
          bogus  [4mcc[24m command in the PATH which always exits success.

       Aegis                   Peter Miller                  Page 8





                                   - 9 -



       builds and tests successfully.

       If a change fails integration, the integration directory  is
       removed,  and  the change is returned to the [4mbeing[24m [4mdeveloped[0m
       state for further  work  by  the  original  developer.   The
       integrator is not responsible for fixing any problems found.

       [1m3.6  Completed  [22mOnce a change builds and tests successfully,
       it  may  be  advanced  to  the  [4mcompleted[24m  state.   The file
       histories are updated at this  point,  and  the  file  locks
       released.   The old baseline is removed, and the integration
       directory is renamed to be the  baseline.   The  development
       directory is also removed.

       Unlike  earlier  states,  a  change  in this state cannot be
       reversed.  If you subsequently wish to  remove  the  change,
       you  will need to create another change and repeat the whole
       process with all edits in reverse.

       A change consists of a description and a list of  files  and
       versions in this state.  A full history of state transitions
       has been kept, including who performed them and when.


       [1m4.  Quality Control[0m

       Quality is addressed in a number of ways.  As  you  can  see
       from  the  above  description  of  how  Aegis manages change
       control, the mandatory testing and reviewing  are  steps  in
       this direction.  Exactly [4mwhat[24m is tested or reviewed is up to
       you, but the places exist in the  process  for  them  to  be
       done.   They  can  be as elaborate or simple as your project
       requires.  Note that there is more to software quality  than
       these  two  items,  and  they  are not the only places where
       tests and reviews can take place.

       [1m4.1  Does it work?   [22mA  major  advantage  of  Aegis  is  the
       ability  to  answer  the  question  "Does  it  work?".  This
       question is asked from a number of perspectives:

          +o The developer wants to know "does this  change  work?".
            Aegis  provides  the answer with tests for each change.
            Developers have always tested  their  code,  but  Aegis
            provides  ergonomic  advantages,  never forgets to test
            something, and the tests are preserved for future  use.

          +o The  integrator  wants  to know "does this change break
            anything else?".  Aegis  provides  the  answer  with  a
            constantly  growing  regression  test  suite,  and also
            makes  the  developer's  own  tests  available  to  the
            integrator.

          +o The project leader, and management further up the tree,
            want to know "does the project work?".  They want to be


       Aegis                   Peter Miller                  Page 9





                                  - 10 -



            able to touch and feel progress towards the target, and
            they want some confidence that  the  project  will  not
            cease to work at random (but usually disastrous) times.
            Aegis provides  the  answer  here  in  the  form  of  a
            baseline  which  always  works, and is always available
            for demonstrations.

       The various mandatory tests and validations are configurable
       for  each project (and in some cases, for each change).  You
       may use as many or as few  of  the  safeguards  provided  by
       Aegis as you need for each project.

       [1m4.2  No Back Door  [22mAnother issue is whether there is a "back
       door" into the process, so that a developer  who  finds  the
       process  tedious  can  avoid  it and just "fix" the baseline
       directly.  With Aegis, there is no  way  to  circumvent  the
       process.

       Access  to  the  baseline  is  read-only for the development
       team, including the integrator.  Access is protected by  the
       UNIX  group and [4mumask[24m mechanisms.  A UNIX group and umask is
       associated  with  each  project,  and  any  commands   Aegis
       executes  will  arrange  to  have  the appropriate group and
       umask, to ensure that all users in that  group  have  access
       (even if the user has a different default group).

       All  developer  commands are run as the developer, and hence
       have the developer's permissions.  All integration  commands
       are  run  as  the  [4mproject[24m  [4mowner[24m  who  is  usually  not the
       integrator (so the integrator can't edit, even if she  wants
       to).   It  is  only  ever  necessary to login as the project
       owner to  perform  actions  beyond  Aegis'  scope,  such  as
       recovering after a disk crash.


       [1m5.  Manifest Control[0m

       Aegis  remembers  where  all the source files are.  They are
       initially created in changes, and only exist in the baseline
       after   a  successful  integration.   The  location  of  the
       baseline and all development directories are known, and  the
       names of all the source files in them are known.


       [1m6.  Version Control[0m

       As   described  above,  Aegis  delegates  the  file  history
       maintenance to  the  package  of  your  choice.   All  Aegis
       requires  is  the  ability  to  determine the latest version
       number for each file's history at integrate  pass,  so  that
       the  random string (it need not look anything like a number)
       may be used later to extract an earlier version,  should  it
       be needed.



       Aegis                   Peter Miller                 Page 10





                                  - 11 -



       The  version string for each source file in the baseline and
       each development directory is known, so that the  difference
       and merge facility described above can work.

       In addition, a project version may be specified when copying
       files from the baseline into  a  change.   Thus  an  earlier
       version  of  the  project  may  be  recreated,  in  order to
       reproduce a bug, for example.


       [1m7.  Build Control[0m

       The change control description mentioned that build  control
       is  delegated  to  the  dependency maintenance tool (DMT) of
       your choice.

       [1m7.1  Capabilities  [22mThe DMT needs to be able to cope with the
       fundamental  concept  of two directories.  This is a "search
       path" for every file, no matter what the file is used for.

       The baseline contains all the implications flowing from  the
       source  files,  this  typically  means the object files from
       compilations and  the  linked  executable.   It  could  also
       include  documentation  and  manual  entries  formatted from
       appropriate source files.

       The development build may thus compile a  minimum  of  code,
       and  link  the rest from the baseline, minimizing disk usage
       and compile time across all developers.

       There is a catch: the dependency maintenance  tool  must  be
       able  to  detect  when  an  include  file in the development
       directory  logically  invalidates  an  object  file  in  the
       baseline,  necessitating re-compilation of a baseline source
       file,  and  leaving  the  object  file  in  the  development
       directory for linking.

       Experience has shown that the various [4mmakedepend[24m programs do
       not work very well.  What is most needed is the  ability  to
       determine  the include files "on the fly".  This implies the
       ability to give DMT rules like

            %.o: %.c `[4mincludes-of[24m %.c`
                 $(CC) -c %.c

       where [4mincludes-of[24m is a program to be invoked when  the  rule
       is  matched,  rather  than  when  it  is read (note the back
       quotes).

       [1m7.2  Dependencies  [22mThe DMT is expected to know  [4mall[24m  project
       dependencies.   This  functionality is completely delegated,
       and so Aegis knows [4mnothing[24m about any dependencies.

       The configuration file for the DMT is a project source file,


       Aegis                   Peter Miller                 Page 11





                                  - 12 -



       and therefore is altered by the same process.


       [1m8.  Directory Structure[0m

       Aegis  attempts  to  dictate as little as possible about the
       directory structure of the projects it supervises.  There is
       one  mandatory  file,  and  one  mandatory  directory.   The
       mandatory file contains Aegis' configuration information for
       the  project, the mandatory directory contains all tests for
       the project.  The configuration file,  and  all  tests,  are
       treated  as source files, and are subject to the same change
       process.

       The source directory tree of each project may be as deep  or
       as shallow as required.

       The   placement   of   project   directories  is  completely
       configurable.  Each project may be owned by a unique user if
       desired,  and Aegis can manage many projects simultaneously.
       Security is through the UNIX groups mechanism, so it can  be
       as open or restricted as required.

       When a change is being developed, it has its own development
       directory.  This development directory is a  subset  of  the
       baseline.   Only  those source files which need to be edited
       are present in the development directory.


       [1m9.  Applicability[0m

       There are some projects which are well suited to supervision
       by Aegis, and there are others which are not.

       Ideally  suited  projects  are  programs which take a set of
       input files, process them, and  generate  a  set  of  output
       files.   Test  cases  may  be  easily  generated, and actual
       output compared with expected output.

       Another class of programs have full-screen  text  interfaces
       or  GUIs  and  thus are not so well suited to supervision by
       Aegis.  Because tests are Bourne  shell  scripts,  only  the
       functionality  accessible  from  the  command  line  can  be
       automatically  tested.   In  these  cases  there  are  three
       options:

          +o Change  the program to optionally accept fake input and
            to write  screen  dumps  to  files,  thus  providing  a
            testable case.

          +o Change the program to allow access to the functionality
            from the command line, thus providing a testable  case.
            Note that this cannot test the user interface.



       Aegis                   Peter Miller                 Page 12





                                  - 13 -



          +o Do   not   do  any  automated  testing.   This  may  be
            configured for a single change or for a whole  project.
            You  still get the supervision aspects of Aegis, but no
            regression test suite.

       The least suitable class  of  programs  for  supervision  by
       Aegis  are  stand-alone  programs.   Operating  systems  and
       embedded systems are members of this class.  The program  in
       a  hand-held  calculator,  for  example,  would be extremely
       difficult to test from a shell script.  It  is  possible  to
       test  this class of programs with the right hardware, but it
       is usually impractical.


       [1m10.  Summary[0m

       This paper has given a very short  overview  of  Aegis,  and
       described  a few of its strengths.  Things to remember about
       Aegis include:

       Aegis is designed to be a small piece in  a  larger  system,
       like many other UNIX utilities.

       Aegis  is  a  project change supervisor, it performs part of
       what is becoming known as software configuration  management
       (SCM).    This  provides  control  for  manifest,  versions,
       building, changes and quality.

       Aegis is not a history tool, such as  RCS.   It  is  layered
       above such a tool.

       Aegis is not a dependency maintenance tool, such as [4mmake[24m(1).
       It is layered above such a  tool.   Any  dependencies  which
       cannot  be expressed in the rules file of the DMT, cannot be
       expressed by Aegis.

       Aegis is not a bug tracking system, it has no mechanisms for
       tracking  bugs and telling you which are fixed and which are
       not.  However, there are notification hooks to  liaise  with
       such a system.

       Aegis  does  not  draw  Gantt  charts,  bubble  charts, flow
       charts, or any other pretty pictures.  It  does  not  itself
       generate  any  code.   It  is  not  a  CASE  system, it is a
       component of a CASE system.

       Aegis attempts to dictate as little as possible  about  each
       project.   It  dictates very little directory structure, and
       it does not dictate  test  content  or  the  review  method.
       Reviews and tests in addition to those required by Aegis may
       be performed.

       Aegis  is  free.   This  means  that  it  has  an  excellent
       cost/benefit ratio, compared to commercial products, even if


       Aegis                   Peter Miller                 Page 13





                                  - 14 -



       it doesn't have all their features.


       [1m11.  Availability[0m

       You can get Aegis by WWW from

              URL:    http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~millerp/
              File:   aegis.4.24.3.tar.gz   [4mthe[24m [4mfull[24m [4msource[0m
              File:   aegis.4.24.3.ps.gz    [4mthe[24m [4mUser[24m [4mGuide[0m

       Aegis is distributed under the terms and conditions  of  the
       GNU  General  Public  License.  Aegis is Copyright (C) 1991,
       1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000,  2001,
       2002,  2003,  2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 Peter
       Miller

       This paper  is  Copyright  (C)  1993  Australian  Geological
       Survey  Organisation.   Apart from any fair dealings for the
       purposes  of  study,  research,  criticism  or  review,   as
       permitted  under  the Australian [4mCopyright[24m [4mACT[24m [4m1968[24m, no part
       may be reproduced  by  any  process  without  prior  written
       permission.    Copyright   is   the  responsibility  of  the
       Executive Director.  Inquiries should  be  directed  to  the
       Principal Information Officer.


       [1m12.  References[0m

       The  following  free  software, and their documentation, are
       referred to in this paper:

       +o Miller, P. A., "Aegis - A Project Change Supervisor," [4mAUUG[0m
         [4m'93[24m [4mConference[24m [4mPapers,[24m 1993, p. 169-178.

       [1] RCS 5.6
         Copyright (C) 1982, 1988, 1989 by Walter F. Tichy.
         Copyright (C) 1990, 1991 by Paul Eggert.

       [2] CVS 1.3
         Copyright  (C)  1986,  1988-1992 Free Software Foundation,
         Inc.
         Numerous authors, principally Brian Berliner.

       [3] GNU Make 3.65
         Copyright (C) 1988-1993 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
         Numerous authors, principally Roland McGrath.

       All of these programs  may  be  fetched  by  FTP  from  your
       closest  GNU  archive  site.  Within Australia, you can find
       them at [4marchie.au[24m in the [4m/gnu[24m directory.





       Aegis                   Peter Miller                 Page 14


